Pengembangan Modul Berpikir Komputasional Berbasis Legenda Batu Batungkat untuk Pembelajaran Koding dan Kecerdasan Artifisial

Kristin Oktaviani; Gede Wiratma Jaya

doi:10.67686/didaktika.v10i2.2177

Authors

Kristin Oktaviani Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 1 Pulau Malan, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia
Gede Wiratma Jaya Universitas Pattimura, Maluku, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67686/didaktika.v10i2.2177

Abstract

This research is motivated by the low computational thinking skills of students and the limitations of contextual teaching materials in coding and artificial intelligence learning at the junior high school level. This study aims to develop a computational thinking module based on the Batu Batungkat legend, and to determine its level of validity, practicality, and effectiveness in learning. The study uses the Research and Development method with the ADDIE model which includes the stages of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The research subjects consisted of 60 ninth-grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Pulau Malan who were divided into an experimental class and a control class with a quasi-experimental design of the pretest–posttest control group type. The results showed that the developed module had a very high level of validity with an average score of 87.68%, very high practicality of 88.75%, and was effective in improving student learning outcomes. The average score of the experimental class increased from 41.14 to 79.43 with an N-Gain value of 0.65, higher than the control class of 0.33. The t-test results showed a significant difference between the two classes. Thus, the computational thinking module based on the Batu Batungkat legend is valid, practical, and effective for use in coding and artificial intelligence learning.

References

Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing Computational Thinking to K–12: What Is Involved and What Is the Role of the Computer Science Education Community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905

Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New Frameworks for Studying and Assessing the Development of Computational Thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

Bruner, J. S. (1960). The Process of Education. Harvard University Press.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The Systematic Design of Instruction (8th ed.). Pearson.

Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of Instructional Design (4th ed.). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Gay, G. (2010). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Gay, G. (2018). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1569395

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K–12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. Indiana University.

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual Teaching and Learning: What It Is and Why It’s Here to Stay. Corwin Press.

Kalelioglu, F., Gulbahar, Y., & Kukul, V. (2016). A Framework for Computational Thinking Based on a Systematic Research Review. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 4(3), 583–596. https://doi.org/10.22364/bjmc.2016.4.3.05

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Capaian Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran Informatika. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678

Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to Reach Product Quality. In Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training (pp. 125–135). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7_10

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. (2013). Educational Design Research: An Introduction. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO).

Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (3rd ed.). Pearson.

Sibarani, R. (2012). Kearifan Lokal: Hakikat, Peran, dan Metode Tradisi Lisan. Asosiasi Tradisi Lisan.

Tomlinson, B. (2011). Materials Development in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667183

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2017). Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding Computational Thinking in K–12 Classrooms. TechTrends, 61(6), 565–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0161-7