Pembelajaran Mendalam Berbasis Interactive Flat Panel Melalui Supervisi Akademik di Sekolah Dasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67686/didaktika.v10i3.2260Abstract
The integration of digital technology in learning requires pedagogical support to ensure meaningful learning processes. In practice, digital tools are often used merely as presentation media, limiting students’ deep engagement. This study aims to analyze the implementation of deep learning through the use of Interactive Flat Panels supported by academic supervision in elementary schools. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed, involving thirteen teachers, including eleven classroom teachers, one physical education teacher, and one Islamic education teacher. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and documentation, and analyzed using an interactive model consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that academic supervision plays a significant role in encouraging teachers to utilize interactive technology more pedagogically. Teachers began integrating visual media, interactive quizzes, and collaborative discussions through Interactive Flat Panels, which increased student participation. However, reflective activities still need to be strengthened to support deeper conceptual understanding. This study concludes that technology-supported academic supervision can serve as an effective strategy to promote the transformation of teaching practices toward deep learning in elementary schools.
References
Abedi, E. A. (2024). Tensions between technology integration practices of teachers and ICT in education policy expectations: Implications for change in teacher knowledge, beliefs and teaching practices. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(4), 1215–1234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00296-6
Burrows, A. C., Swarts, G. P., Hutchison, L., Katzmann, J. M., Thompson, R., Freeman, L., Schanke, A., Kilty, T., & Reynolds, T. (2021). Finding spaces: Teacher education technology competencies (TETCs). Education Sciences, 11(11), 733. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110733
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep Learning: Engage the World Change the World. Corwin Press.
Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2018). SuperVision and Instructional Leadership: A Developmental Approach. Pearson.
Goode, E., Nieuwoudt, J., & Roche, T. (2022). Does online engagement matter? The impact of interactive learning modules and synchronous class attendance on student achievement in an immersive delivery model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7929
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Handayani, R. (2024). Supervisi akademik berbasis teknologi dalam peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 31(1), 85–96.
Hattie, J. A., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). Learning strategies: A synthesis and conceptual model. Npj Science of Learning, 55(3), 223–252.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13–19.
König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. Routledge.
Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2021). Instructional leadership and teacher professional learning in China: The mediating role of teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(1), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219879376
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis 3rd Edition: Source book of Bew Methods. Baverly Hills: SAGE Publications Inc.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Mouza, C., Yang, H., Pan, Y.-C., Ozden, S. Y., & Pollock, L. (2016). Resetting educational technology coursework for pre-service teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 61–76.
Mulyasa, E. (2020). Menjadi Kepala Sekolah Profesional. Remaja Rosdakarya.
OECD. (2021). Digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with AI, blockchain and robots. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-digital-education-outlook-2021_589b283f-en.html
Redecker, C. (2020). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union.
Schwartz, D. L., Tsang, J. M., & Blair, K. P. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Transforming Education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10245-7
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates. Bloomsbury Academic.
Sermal, S., & Yunus, M. (2024). Digital-based supervision in improving teacher professional competence. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(2), 210–223.
Siswanto, R., Abidin, A. A., Kadarisman, K., Jaya, F., Sucipto, S., & Yati, Y. (2025). Multidimensional intelligence on teacher performance in elementary schools. Indonesian Research Journal in Education (IRJE), 9(02), 1055–1067. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v9i02.45456
Siswanto, R., Sudarno, S., Widodo, S. F. A., & Kande, F. A. (2024). Peran Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Dalam Penentuan Guru Kelas di Sekolah Dasar: Studi Kasus di Kota Surabaya. JPAP (Jurnal Praktisi Administrasi Pendidikan), 8(2), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpap.v8i2.665
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, R&D dan Penelitian Pendidikan (ke-3, Ceta). Alfabeta.
Suryadi, A. (2019). Pemanfaatan teknologi pembelajaran di sekolah dasar dalam era digital. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 10(2), 123–134.
Suryandari, D. A., Wakidah, S. A., & Sudi, S. (2026). Pemanfaatan teknologi interactive flat panel (IFP) sebagai sarana pembelajaran aktif pada pembelajaran IPAS kelas IV di SDN Menteng Atas 01 Jakarta Selatan. Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan (JKIP), 7(1), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.55583/jkip.v7i1.1927
Susanto, A., & Akbar, S. (2021). Integrasi teknologi dalam pembelajaran sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(1), 88–98.
Zhao, Y., Chen, L., & Wang, Q. (2025). Institutional support and technology integration in schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(1), 55–70.
Zhao, Y., & Watterston, J. (2021). The changes we need: Education post COVID-19. Journal of Educational Change, 22(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09417-3
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mita Hidayanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
