Pengaruh Kegiatan Plugged dan Unplugged Terhadap Berpikir Komputasional Murid SMP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v8i3.1680Abstrak
Berpikir komputasional menjadi fokus utama dalam pendidikan di banyak negara, termasuk di Indonesia. Pembelajaran Informatika sebagai fondasi pengembangan berpikir komputasional murid dapat dilaksanakan dengan menggunakan metode unplugged dan plugged. Dimana murid masih pada tahap dasar terhadap Berpikir Komputasional dalam pembelajaran Informatika. Berdasarkan beberapa penelitian terdahulu memperoleh hasil yang bertentangan terkait pengaruh metode plugged dan unplugged terhadap keterampilan komputasional murid. Penelitian ini bertujuan menguji pengaruh kegiatan plugged dan unplugged terhadap berpikir komputasional murid SMP. Penelitian kuasi eksperimen ini melibatkan dua kelas 7 dengan total 64 murid sebagai sampel. Selanjutnya, masing-masing kelas terdiri dari 32 murid yang disebut sebagai kelas kontrol (unplugged) dan kelas eksperimen (plugged). Berdasarkan uji pretest dan posttest dalam kelompok, penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa baik kegiatan unplugged maupun plugged berpengaruh besar dalam peningkatan keterampilan berpikir komputasional murid SMP. Sementara itu, hasil uji Mann-Whitney menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan antara pengaruh metode unplugged dan metode plugged terhadap keterampilan berpikir komputasional. Hasil penelitian in mengindikasikan bahwa guru dapat memilih salah satu metode pembelajaran Informatika baik unplugged maupun plugged atau mengombinasikan kedua metode tersebut.
Referensi
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1, 25.
Caeli, E. N., & Yadav, A. (2020). Unplugged Approaches to Computational Thinking: a Historical Perspective. TechTrends, 64(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00410-5
Cárdenas-Cobo, J., Puris, A., Novoa-Hernández, P., Parra-Jiménez, Á., Moreno-León, J., & Benavides, D. (2021). Using scratch to improve learning programming in college students: A positive experience from a non-weird country. Electronics (Switzerland), 10(10), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10101180
Chen, P., Yang, D., Metwally, A. H. S., Lavonen, J., & Wang, X. (2023). Fostering computational thinking through unplugged activities: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00434-7
Chongo, S., Osman, K., & Nayan, N. A. (2021). Impact of the Plugged-in and Unplugged Chemistry Computational Thinking Modules on Achievement in Chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10789
Cohen, J. (1992). A Power Primer Psychol Bull 112:155-159. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
del Olmo-Muñoz, J., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & González-Calero, J. A. (2020). Computational thinking through unplugged activities in early years of Primary Education. Computers and Education, 150(September 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103832
Delal, H., & Oner, D. (2020). Developing middle school students’ computational thinking skills using unplugged computing activities. Informatics in Education, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15388/INFEDU.2020.01
Dong, W., Li, Y., Sun, L., & Liu, Y. (2024). Developing pre-service teachers’ computational thinking: a systematic literature review. In International Journal of Technology and Design Education (Vol. 34, Issue 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09811-3
Dúo-Terrón, P. (2023). Analysis of Scratch Software in Scientific Production for 20 Years: Programming in Education to Develop Computational Thinking and STEAM Disciplines. Education Sciences, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040404
Erümit, A. K., & Sahin, G. (2020). Plugged or Unplugged Teaching: A Case Study of Students’ Preferences in the Teaching of Programming. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 4(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v4i1.82
Fagerlund, J., Häkkinen, P., Vesisenaho, M., & Viiri, J. (2021). Computational thinking in programming with Scratch in primary schools: A systematic review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22255
Herawati, E. (2022). Penerapan STEAM Project Based Learning “Taman Mini Imun Booster Digital Berbasis QR Code Berbantuan 4DFrame.” Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 6(3), 1139–1156. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v6i3.679
Hermans, F., & Aivaloglou, E. (2017). A controlled experiment comparing plugged first and unplugged first programming lessons. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137065.3137072
Huang, W., & Looi, C. K. (2020). A critical review of literature on “unplugged” pedagogies in K-12 computer science and computational thinking education. Computer Science Education, 00(00), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1789411
Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Khan, S., Namukasa, I. K., Somanath, S., Weber, J., & Yiu, C. (2017). A Pedagogical Framework for Computational Thinking. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-017-0031-2
Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2020). Computational Thinking Is More about Thinking than Computing. Journal for STEM Education Research, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00030-2
Memolo, T. (2022). Pembelajaran Matematika Berpikir Komputasi Materi Pola Bilangan dengan Media Kalkulator Web Berbasis Javascript. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 6(3), 815–826. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v6i3.854
Merino-Armero, J. M., González-Calero, J. A., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & Del Olmo-Muñoz, J. (2022). Unplugged Activities in Cross-Curricular Teaching: Effect on Sixth Graders’ Computational Thinking and Learning Outcomes. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6020013
Miller, B., Kirn, A., Anderson, M., Major, J. C., Feil-Seifer, D., & Jurkiewicz, M. (2018). Unplugged Robotics to Increase K-12 Students’ Engineering Interest and Attitudes. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2018-Octob, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658959
Molina-Ayuso, Á., Adamuz-Povedano, N., Bracho-López, R., & Torralbo-Rodríguez, M. (2022). Introduction to Computational Thinking with Scratch for Teacher Training for Spanish Primary School Teachers in Mathematics. Education Sciences, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120899
Nasiba, U. (2022). Brankas Rahasia: Media Pembelajaran Numerasi Berbasis Berpikir Komputasi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 6(2), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v6i2.764
Osman, K., & Lay, A. N. (2022). MyKimDG module: an interactive platform towards development of twenty-first century skills and improvement of students’ knowledge in chemistry. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1461–1474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1729208
Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual - 6th Edition 2017.pdf. Open University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452.
Pérez-Marín, D., Hijón-Neira, R., Bacelo, A., & Pizarro, C. (2020). Can computational thinking be improved by using a methodology based on metaphors and scratch to teach computer programming to children? Computers in Human Behavior, 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.027
Piedade, J., & Dorotea, N. (2023). Effects of Scratch-Based Activities on 4th-Grade Students’ Computational Thinking Skills. Informatics in Education, 22(3), 499–523. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2023.19'
Rodríguez-Martínez, J. A., González-Calero, J. A., & Sáez-López, J. M. (2020). Computational thinking and mathematics using Scratch: an experiment with sixth-grade students. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612448
Saxena, A., Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Wong, G. K. W. (2020). Designing Unplugged and Plugged Activities to Cultivate Computational Thinking: An Exploratory Study in Early Childhood Education. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00478-w
Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2013). Computational Thinking : The Developing Definition. ITiCSE Conference 2013, 5–8.
Sigayret, K., Tricot, A., & Blanc, N. (2022). Unplugged or plugged-in programming learning: A comparative experimental study. In Computers and Education (Vol. 184). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104505
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian pendidikan:(pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D). Alfabeta.
Suhardi, R. M., & Utama, G. Y. (2022). The Effect of Implementing STEAM and 4Dframe Learning in Developing Students’ Computational Thinking Skills. Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal, 12(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v12i1.138
Threekunprapa, A., & Yasri, P. (2020). Unplugged coding using flowblocks for promoting computational thinking and programming among secondary school students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13314a
Tonbuloğlu, B., & Tonbuloğlu, I. (2019). The effect of unplugged coding activities on computational thinking skills of middle school students. Informatics in Education, 18(2), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2019.19
Twigg, S., Blair, L., & Winter, E. (2019). Using children’s literature to introduce computing principles and concepts in primary schools: Work in progress. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3361721.3362116
Voon, X. P., Wong, S. L., Wong, L. H., Khambari, M. N. M., & Syed-Abdullah, S. I. S. (2023). Developing pre-service teachers’ computational thinking through experiential learning: hybridisation of plugged and unplugged approaches. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18006
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Wing, J. M. (2011). Research notebook: Computational thinking—What and why? The Link Magazine, 6, 20–23.
Zapata-Cáceres, M., Marcelino, P., El-Hamamsy, L., & Martín-Barroso, E. (2024). A Bebras Computational Thinking (ABC-Thinking) program for primary school: Evaluation using the competent computational thinking test. Education and Information Technologies, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12441-w
Zhang, L. C., & Nouri, J. (2019). A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9. Computers and Education, 141, 103607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Semua materi yang diterbitkan oleh Jurnal_Didaktika_Pendidikan_Dasar dilisensikan di bawah Lisensi Internasional Creative Commons 4.0 (CC-BY-SA) atau lisensi yang setara sebagai lisensi optimal untuk publikasi, distribusi, penggunaan, dan penggunaan kembali karya ilmiah. Izin akses di luar cakupan lisensi ini mungkin tersedia di perpustakaan digital dan database jurnal akses terbuka.
