Evaluasi Formatif Penerapan Model E-Pembelajaran Program Pembatik Level 4

Moch. Abduh; Saleh Syarifuddin; Nita Isaeni

doi:10.26811/didaktika.v9i1.1410

Authors

Moch. Abduh Direktorat Guru Pendidikan Dasar, Ditjen GTK, Kemdikbudristek, Indonesia
Saleh Syarifuddin Pusat Data dan Teknologi Informasi, Kemdikbudristek, Indonesia
Nita Isaeni Direktorat Guru Pendidikan Dasar, Ditjen GTK, Kemdikbudristek, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v9i1.1410

Abstract

The role of formative evaluation in implementing e-learning as a learning tool in a teacher competency improvement program called Technology and Communication Based Learning (PembaTIK) is crucial. This study aims to determine the success of the implementation of the implementation of the training evaluation model 4. This study was conducted using a quantitative descriptive method, which was collected through an online survey questionnaire. The subjects of this study consisted of 498 respondents (48.8% of the 1,020 participant population) spread across 34 provinces at various levels of education units. The results of the study showed that: (1) at the reaction aspect, 95.9% of respondents stated a high level of satisfaction of Level 4 PembaTIK participants with the preparation of facilities and infrastructure; (2) at the learning aspect, 96.8% of respondents stated a high level of satisfaction with the implementation of the learning process followed and the support received during the training; and (3) At the behavioral aspect, 96.7% of respondents felt that there was a change in a positive/good direction in the attitudes and competencies of participants after participating in the learning process. So, it is concluded that there is an increase of competence in Technology and Communication Based Learning Level 4 through the application of e-learning.

Author Biography

Moch. Abduh, Direktorat Guru Pendidikan Dasar, Ditjen GTK, Kemdikbudristek, Indonesia

References

Abduh, M., Utami, G. S., & Sumarno, S. (2022). Kajian Reflektif Pembatik 2021 untuk Perbaikan Pembelajaran Berbasis MOOC. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 6(3), 1093–1124. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v6i3.983.

Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2011). Interaction in Distance Education and Online Learning: Using Evidence and Theory to Improve Practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2–3), 82–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-011-9043-x.

Akinyemi, A. F., Rembe, S., Shumba, J., & Adewumi, T. M. (2019). Collaboration and Mutual Support as Processes Established by Communities of Practice to Improve Continuing Professional Teachers’ Development in High Schools. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1685446. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1685446.

Antony, S., & Ramnath, R. (2023). A Phenomenological Exploration of Students’ Perceptions of AI Chatbots in Higher Education. IAFOR Journal of Education, 11(2), 7-38. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1403709.

Arvidsson, T. S., & Kuhn, D. (2021). Realizing the Full Potential of Individualizing Learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65 (February), 101960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101960.

Brahim, E. F., Mohammed, K. I., & Samir, B. (2010). A Formative Assessment Model within the Competency-Based-Approach for an Individualized e-Learning Path. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 64 (January), 208–212.

Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to Use and Assess Qualitative Research Methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z.

Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: the Online Student Engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning Journal (OLJ), 19(4), 143. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1079585.

Donkin, R., & Askew, E. (2017). An Evaluation of Formative “In-Class” versus “E-Learning” Activities to Benefit Student Learning Outcomes in Biomedical Sciences. Journal of Biomedical Education, 2017, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9127978.

Fitria, T. N. (2022). Using Canva as Media for English Language Teaching (ELT) in Developing Creativity for Informatics Students. TELT Echo: The Journal of English Language Teaching in Foreign Language Context, 7(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.24235/eltecho.v7i1.10789.

Gardanova, Z., Ponkratov, V., Kuznetsov, N., Nikitina, N., Dudnik, O., Latypova, E., & Shcherbatykh, S. (2020). A Model for Optimizing the Structure of Teaching Techniques for Distance Learning in the Russian Higher Education System. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040147.

Inayah, R., & Cahyati, S. S. (2023). Promoting Students’ Independent Learning Strategies in Facing Online Learning: Students’ Voices. English Journal Literacy Utama, 7(2), 702–709. https://doi.org/10.33197/ejlutama.v7i2.200.

Jamaluddin, N. H. S., Saprin, S., & Rasyid, M. R. (2021). Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (Pembatik) di SMP Negeri 6 Batauga Kecamatan Batauga Buton Selatan. Jurnal Mercusuar, 2(4), 11–30. https://journal3.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/mercusuar/article/view/28046.

Jonnaert, P., Barrette, J., Masciotra, D., & Yaya, M. (2006). La Compétence Comme Organisateur Des Programmes De Formation Revisitée, Ou La Nécessité de Passer de ce Concept à Celui de « l’agir Compétent ». Bureau International D’éducation de l’UNESCO. In The series IBE Working Papers on Curriculum Issues is intended to shar (Issue September).

Julifan, J. (2015). Efektivitas Manajemen Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Berbasis Kompetensi bagi Guru. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan UPI, 12(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v22i2.5382.

Kelley-Quon, L. I. (2018). Surveys: Merging Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods. Seminars in Pediatric Surgery, 27(6), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2018.10.007.

Lumbantobing, P., & Syaodih, E. (2024). Analysis of Teacher Competence Using ICT in Learning After Pembatik (Pembelajaran Berbasis TIK) Program Implementation. International Conference on Elementary Education, 6(1), 383–393.

Martiningsih, R. R. (2021). Dampak Bimtek Daring Pembatik Level Dua Terhadap Kemampuan Tik Guru Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Teknodik, 25(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v25i1.378.

Mustofa, M. I. (2019). Formulasi Model Perkuliahan Daring Sebagai Upaya MenekanDisparitas Kualitas Perguruan Tinggi (Studiterhadap Website pditt.belajar.kemdikbud.go.id). WJIT: Walisongo Journal of Information Technology, 1(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.21580/wjit.

Nurasyiah, H. (2017). Pengaruh Diklat (Pendidikan dan Pelatihan) terhadap Prestasi Kerja Karyawan di Bank BPR Rokan Hulu. Cano Ekonomos, 6(1), 71–82.

Oegiers, X. R. (2004). Quels Sont Les Termes Les Plus Efficaces Dans La Communication Pédagogique ? (pp. 1–29).

Oliveira, G., Grenha Teixeira, J., Torres, A., & Morais, C. (2021). An Exploratory Study on the Emergency Remote Education Experience of Higher Education Students and Teachers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1357–1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13112.

Permatasari, I. (2018). Pengaruh E-Learning Sebagai Media Pelatihan dan Pengembangan Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan BCA KCU Tangerang. Jurnal Sisfokom, 7(1), 1-8

Phillips, R., McNaught, C., & Kennedy, G. (2012). Evaluating e-Learning: Guiding Research and Practice. Routledge.

Pusdatin. (2020). Pedoman Pemanfaatan Pusat Sumber Belajar (PSB) Berbasis TIK di Sekolah. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Pustekkom. (2017). Portal pembelajaran Rumah Belajar. Kemendikbud.

Putri, I., & Jumardi, J. (2023). Utilization of the Canva Application on the belajar.id site as a Learning Media at SMK Bina Nusa Mandiri Jakarta. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 10(4), 344–352. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v10i4.63299.

Reeves, T. C., & Hedberg, J. C. (2003). Interactive Learning Systems Evaluation. NJ Educational Technology Publications.

Richardo, R. (2016). Program Guru Pembelajar: Upaya Peningkatan profesionalisme Guru di Abad 21. Prosiding Seminar Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 777–785. http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id.

Riduwan. (2012). Skala Pengukuran Variabel-variabel Penelitian. Alfabeta.

Rukajat, A. (2018). Teknik evaluasi pembelajaran. Deepublish.

Rusmanto, R., & Rukun, K. (2020). The Development of E-Learning Module Based on Project-Based Learning (PjBL) for Electric Motor Installation Course. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(2), 181-193. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v4i2.24608.

Sadikin, A. (2020). Pembelajaran Daring di Tengah Wabah Covid-19. BIODIK Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 6(2), 214–224.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Susilawati, E. (2017). Analisis Swot Penyelenggaraan Diklat Online Tik Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1(3), 349-364. https://jurnaldikbud.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/jpnk/article/view/395.

Warsita, B. (2016). Evaluasi Bahan Belajar Diklat Online Calon Pejabat Fungsional Pengembang Teknologi Pembelajaran. Jurnal Teknodik, 20(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.v20i1.181.

Yanti, M. T. (2020). Pemanfaatan Portal Rumah Belajar Kemendikbud Sebagai Model Pembelajaran Daring di Sekolah Dasar. UNIVERSITAS JAMBI. https://repository.unja.ac.id/11723/.

Yanuarti, R., Utari, I., & Harianti, D. (2022). Evaluasi Pemanfaatan E-Modul sebagai Bahan Belajar Mandiri dalam Program Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru: Evaluation of E-Module Utilization as Self-directed Learning Materials in Teachers’ Competency Improvement Program. Jurnal Teknodik, 26(2), 101-114. https://doi.org/10.32550/teknodik.vi.972.