Pengaruh Kegiatan Plugged dan Unplugged Terhadap Berpikir Komputasional Murid SMP

Authors

  • Yohan Adi Setiawan Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 2 Kalitidu, Bojonegoro, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
  • Sariaman Siringo Ringo Sekolah Menegah Pertana Negeri Satu Atap 1 Pengabuan, Tanjung Jabung Barat, Jambi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v8i3.1680

Abstract

Computational thinking has become a major focus in education in many countries, including Indonesia. As a foundation for developing students’ computational thinking, informatics learning can be done using unplugged and plugged methods. Students are still at the basic stage of Computational Thinking in Informatics learning. Based on several previous studies obtained conflicting results regarding the influence of plugged and unplugged methods on students’ computational thinking. The present study endeavors to assess the impact of both plugged and unplugged activities on the computational thinking proficiencies of junior high school students. This quasi-experimental research enlisted two 7th-grade cohorts comprising a cumulative total of 64 students. Each cohort, comprising 32 students, was assigned to a control group (unplugged activities) and an experimental group (plugged activities). Based on pretest and posttest tests in groups, this research reveals that both unplugged and plugged activities have a big influence on improving junior high school students' computational thinking skills. Meanwhile, the results of the Mann-Whitney test show that there is no difference between the effect of the plugged method and the unplugged method on computational thinking skills. This research indicates that teachers can choose one of the Informatics learning methods, either plugged or unplugged, or combine the two methods.

References

Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1, 25.

Caeli, E. N., & Yadav, A. (2020). Unplugged Approaches to Computational Thinking: a Historical Perspective. TechTrends, 64(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00410-5

Cárdenas-Cobo, J., Puris, A., Novoa-Hernández, P., Parra-Jiménez, Á., Moreno-León, J., & Benavides, D. (2021). Using scratch to improve learning programming in college students: A positive experience from a non-weird country. Electronics (Switzerland), 10(10), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10101180

Chen, P., Yang, D., Metwally, A. H. S., Lavonen, J., & Wang, X. (2023). Fostering computational thinking through unplugged activities: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00434-7

Chongo, S., Osman, K., & Nayan, N. A. (2021). Impact of the Plugged-in and Unplugged Chemistry Computational Thinking Modules on Achievement in Chemistry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10789

Cohen, J. (1992). A Power Primer Psychol Bull 112:155-159. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.

del Olmo-Muñoz, J., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & González-Calero, J. A. (2020). Computational thinking through unplugged activities in early years of Primary Education. Computers and Education, 150(September 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103832

Delal, H., & Oner, D. (2020). Developing middle school students’ computational thinking skills using unplugged computing activities. Informatics in Education, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15388/INFEDU.2020.01

Dong, W., Li, Y., Sun, L., & Liu, Y. (2024). Developing pre-service teachers’ computational thinking: a systematic literature review. In International Journal of Technology and Design Education (Vol. 34, Issue 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09811-3

Dúo-Terrón, P. (2023). Analysis of Scratch Software in Scientific Production for 20 Years: Programming in Education to Develop Computational Thinking and STEAM Disciplines. Education Sciences, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040404

Erümit, A. K., & Sahin, G. (2020). Plugged or Unplugged Teaching: A Case Study of Students’ Preferences in the Teaching of Programming. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 4(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v4i1.82

Fagerlund, J., Häkkinen, P., Vesisenaho, M., & Viiri, J. (2021). Computational thinking in programming with Scratch in primary schools: A systematic review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22255

Herawati, E. (2022). Penerapan STEAM Project Based Learning “Taman Mini Imun Booster Digital Berbasis QR Code Berbantuan 4DFrame.” Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 6(3), 1139–1156. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v6i3.679

Hermans, F., & Aivaloglou, E. (2017). A controlled experiment comparing plugged first and unplugged first programming lessons. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/3137065.3137072

Huang, W., & Looi, C. K. (2020). A critical review of literature on “unplugged” pedagogies in K-12 computer science and computational thinking education. Computer Science Education, 00(00), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1789411

Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Khan, S., Namukasa, I. K., Somanath, S., Weber, J., & Yiu, C. (2017). A Pedagogical Framework for Computational Thinking. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-017-0031-2

Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2020). Computational Thinking Is More about Thinking than Computing. Journal for STEM Education Research, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00030-2

Memolo, T. (2022). Pembelajaran Matematika Berpikir Komputasi Materi Pola Bilangan dengan Media Kalkulator Web Berbasis Javascript. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 6(3), 815–826. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v6i3.854

Merino-Armero, J. M., González-Calero, J. A., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., & Del Olmo-Muñoz, J. (2022). Unplugged Activities in Cross-Curricular Teaching: Effect on Sixth Graders’ Computational Thinking and Learning Outcomes. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6020013

Miller, B., Kirn, A., Anderson, M., Major, J. C., Feil-Seifer, D., & Jurkiewicz, M. (2018). Unplugged Robotics to Increase K-12 Students’ Engineering Interest and Attitudes. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2018-Octob, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658959

Molina-Ayuso, Á., Adamuz-Povedano, N., Bracho-López, R., & Torralbo-Rodríguez, M. (2022). Introduction to Computational Thinking with Scratch for Teacher Training for Spanish Primary School Teachers in Mathematics. Education Sciences, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120899

Nasiba, U. (2022). Brankas Rahasia: Media Pembelajaran Numerasi Berbasis Berpikir Komputasi untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 6(2), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v6i2.764

Osman, K., & Lay, A. N. (2022). MyKimDG module: an interactive platform towards development of twenty-first century skills and improvement of students’ knowledge in chemistry. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1461–1474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1729208

Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual - 6th Edition 2017.pdf. Open University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452.

Pérez-Marín, D., Hijón-Neira, R., Bacelo, A., & Pizarro, C. (2020). Can computational thinking be improved by using a methodology based on metaphors and scratch to teach computer programming to children? Computers in Human Behavior, 105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.027

Piedade, J., & Dorotea, N. (2023). Effects of Scratch-Based Activities on 4th-Grade Students’ Computational Thinking Skills. Informatics in Education, 22(3), 499–523. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2023.19'

Rodríguez-Martínez, J. A., González-Calero, J. A., & Sáez-López, J. M. (2020). Computational thinking and mathematics using Scratch: an experiment with sixth-grade students. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612448

Saxena, A., Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Wong, G. K. W. (2020). Designing Unplugged and Plugged Activities to Cultivate Computational Thinking: An Exploratory Study in Early Childhood Education. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00478-w

Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2013). Computational Thinking : The Developing Definition. ITiCSE Conference 2013, 5–8.

Sigayret, K., Tricot, A., & Blanc, N. (2022). Unplugged or plugged-in programming learning: A comparative experimental study. In Computers and Education (Vol. 184). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104505

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian pendidikan:(pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D). Alfabeta.

Suhardi, R. M., & Utama, G. Y. (2022). The Effect of Implementing STEAM and 4Dframe Learning in Developing Students’ Computational Thinking Skills. Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal, 12(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.46517/seamej.v12i1.138

Threekunprapa, A., & Yasri, P. (2020). Unplugged coding using flowblocks for promoting computational thinking and programming among secondary school students. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13314a

Tonbuloğlu, B., & Tonbuloğlu, I. (2019). The effect of unplugged coding activities on computational thinking skills of middle school students. Informatics in Education, 18(2), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2019.19

Twigg, S., Blair, L., & Winter, E. (2019). Using children’s literature to introduce computing principles and concepts in primary schools: Work in progress. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3361721.3362116

Voon, X. P., Wong, S. L., Wong, L. H., Khambari, M. N. M., & Syed-Abdullah, S. I. S. (2023). Developing pre-service teachers’ computational thinking through experiential learning: hybridisation of plugged and unplugged approaches. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18006

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Wing, J. M. (2011). Research notebook: Computational thinking—What and why? The Link Magazine, 6, 20–23.

Zapata-Cáceres, M., Marcelino, P., El-Hamamsy, L., & Martín-Barroso, E. (2024). A Bebras Computational Thinking (ABC-Thinking) program for primary school: Evaluation using the competent computational thinking test. Education and Information Technologies, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12441-w

Zhang, L. C., & Nouri, J. (2019). A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9. Computers and Education, 141, 103607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607

Published

2024-11-30

How to Cite

Setiawan, Y. A., & Ringo, S. S. (2024). Pengaruh Kegiatan Plugged dan Unplugged Terhadap Berpikir Komputasional Murid SMP. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 8(3), 993-1014. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v8i3.1680