Two-Tiers Test Berbasis Everyday Life Activity Stimulus untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Numerasi AKM Siswa Sekolah Dasar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v9i1.1764Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membuktikan kualitas instrumen penilaian numerasi two-tier dengan stimulus aktivitas sehari-hari dalam meningkatkan hasil capaian numerasi. Instrumen numerasi diujikan pada 442 siswa Sekolah Dasar (SD) di Kabupaten Kulon Progo yang diambil dengan teknik random sampling. Validitas instrumen dibuktikan dengan formula Aiken untuk validitas isi dan Exploratofy Factor Analysis untuk validitas konstruk. Reliabilitas instrumen dibuktikan dengan Cronbach’s Alpha. Kualitas tes dianalisis menggunakan Item Response Theory melalui uji Partial Credit Model dan analisis deskriptif untuk membandingkan perbedaan hasil AKM tahun 2022 dan tahun 2023. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa instrumen yang digunakan memenuhi kriteria validitas isi dengan indeks Aiken lebih dari 0,7 dan nilai KMO-MSA pada validitas konstruknya sebesar 0,78 dengan nilai signifikansi Bartlett’s 0,00 yang berarti memenuhi validitas konstruk. Reliabilitas berada pada kategori sangat andal dengan nilai Cronbach’s Alpha sebesar 0,872. Instrumen yang digunakan dapat mengukur kemampuan siswa pada rentang -1,2 sampai 2,8 dengan memberikan fungsi informasi maksimal sebesar 58 dengan standar error 0,7. Capaian kemampuan numerasi terbukti mengalami kenaikan sebanyak 16,01% dibandingkan hasil capaian numerasi sebelum (30,60%) dan sesudah tes (46,67%) dilakukan. Dapat disimpulkan bahwa instrumen penilaian numerasi two-tier test berbasis aktivitas sehari-hari layak digunakan untuk meningkatkan capaian kemampuan numerasi.
Referensi
Abidin, M., & Retnawati, H. (2019). A Diagnosis of Difficulties in Answering Questions of Circle Material on Junior High School Students. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i2.16454.
Achmetli, K., Schukajlow, S., & Rakoczy, K. (2019). Multiple Solutions for Real-World Problems, Experience of Competence and Students’ Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(8), 1605–1625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9936-5
Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content Validity and Reliability of Single Items or Questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419.
Allen, M. ., & Yen, W. (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory. Wadsworth.Inc.
Asrizal, A., Amran, A., Ananda, A., & Festiyed, F. (2018). Effectiveness of Adaptive Contextual Learning Model of Integrated Science by Integrating Digital Age Literacy on Grade VIII Students. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012067.
Azhari, B., Johar, R., Ramadhani, E., Mailizar, M., & Safrina, K. (2024). Mathematics Learning Model for Children with Dyscalculia through Special Intervention. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(3), 1155–1184. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i3.1528.
Aziza, M. (2019). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Tertutup dan Terbuka pada Pokok Bahasan Lingkaran. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v14i2.26563.
Bennison, A., Goos, M., & Geiger, V. (2020). Utilising a Research-Informed Instructional Design Approach to Develop an Online Resource to Support Teacher Professional Learning on Embedding Numeracy Across the Curriculum. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(5), 1017–1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01140-2.
Clarke, B. (2022). Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2016–2019. In Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2021.1899971.
Cobo, C. (2013). Skills for Innovation: Envisioning an Education that Prepares for the Changing World. Curriculum Journal, 24(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2012.744330.
Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2020). Numeracy Across the Curriculum: Research-Based Strategies for Enhancing Teaching and Learning. Routledge.
Duskri, M., Kumaidi, K., & Suryanto, S. (2014). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Kesulitan Belajar Matematika di SD. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2123.
Faizah, U., Zuchdi, D., & Alsamiri, Y. (2019). An Authentic Assessment Model to Assess Kindergarten Students’ Character. Research and Evaluation in Education, 5(2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v5i2.24588.
Geiger, V., Forgasz, H., & Goos, M. (2015). A Critical Orientation to Numeracy Across the Curriculum. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 47(4), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0648-1.
Goos, M., Geiger, V., & Dole, S. (2011). Teachers’ Personal Conceptions of Numeracy. 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, 457–464.
Halim, A., Mustafa, Nurulwati, Soewarno, & Nanda, N. (2018). Development of Two-Tier Diagnostic Test Based on E-Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1120(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1120/1/012030.
Hamidy, A., & Jailani, J. (2019). Kemampuan Proses Matematis Siswa Kalimantan Timur dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika model PISA. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 133–149. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v6i2.26679.
Haryanto, H. (2013). Pengembangan Computerized Adaptive Testing (Cat) Dengan Algoritma Logika Fuzzy. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 15(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v15i1.1087.
Isgiyanto, A. (2013). Perbandingan Penyekoran Model Rasch dan Model Partial Credit pada Matematika. Jurnal Kependidikan, 43(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v43i1.1954.
Jupri, A., Drijvers, P., & Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2014). Student Difficulties in Solving Equations from an Operational and a Structural Perspective. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(1–2), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/280
Kartowagiran, B., Mardapi, D., Purnama, D. N., & Kriswantoro, K. (2019). Parallel Tests Viewed from the Arrangement of Item Numbers and Alternative Answers. Research and Evaluation in Education, 5(2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v5i2.23721.
Kemendikbud. (2020). AKM dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran. Pusat Asesmen Dan Pembelajaran Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan KebudayaanPembelajaran Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–37.
Khasanah, D. R. A. U., Pramudibyanto, H., & Widuroyekti, B. (2020). Pendidikan dalam Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Sinestesia, 10(1), 41–48. https://www.sinestesia.pustaka.my.id/journal/article/view/44.
Khoiriah, K. (2022). Assessment for Learning Berorientasi Higher Order Thinking Skills untuk Menstimulus Kecakapan Literasi Numerasi. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 6(1), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v6i1.740.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Helping Children Learn Mathematics. In Center for Education Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council (Vol. 17, Issue 12). National Academy Press.
Kovas, Y., Voronin, I., Kaydalov, A., Malykh, S. B., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2013). Literacy and Numeracy Are More Heritable Than Intelligence in Primary School. Psychological Science, 24(10), 2048–2056. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613486982.
Li, F. Y., Hwang, G. J., Chen, P. Y., & Lin, Y. J. (2021). Effects of a Concept Mapping-Based Two-Tier Test Strategy on Students’ Digital Game-Based Learning Performances and Behavioral Patterns. Computers and Education, 173(June), 104293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104293.
Mardapi, D. (2007). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan NonTes. Mitra Cendekia.
Maulidiansyah, D., Meutia, I., & Istiyono, E. (2021). Computer-Based Two-Tier Diagnostic Test to Identify Critical Thinking Skills in Optical Instrument. Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020), 541(Isse 2020), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210326.059.
Md-Ali, R., Karim, H. B. B. A., & Yusof, F. M. (2016). Experienced Primary School Teachers’ Thoughts on Effective Teachers of Literacy and Numeracy. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 13(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2016.13.1.3.
Mestre, J. P., Docktor, J. L., Strand, N. E., & Ross, B. H. (2011). Conceptual Problem Solving in Physics. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 55). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00009-0.
Munayati, Z., zulkardi, & Santoso, B. (2015). Kajian Soal Buku Teks Matematika Kelas X Kurikulum 2013 Menggunakan Framework PISA. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Sriwijaya, 9(2), 188–206. https://unej.id/1cWvAd2.
Muzaffar, A., Irfan, A., & Tabrani ZA. (2020). Kemampuan Pedagogical Content Knowledge Alumni Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika: Media Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 21(1), 41-60. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/jid.v21i1.7129.
Novotná, J., Eisenmann, P., Přibyl, J., Ondrušová, J., & Břehovský, J. (2012). Problem Solving in School Mathematics Based on Heuristic Strategies. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 7(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2013.070101.Introduction.
Philip, T. M., Olivares-Pasillas, M. C., & Rocha, J. (2016). Becoming Racially Literate About Data and Data-Literate About Race: Data Visualizations in the Classroom as a Site of Racial-Ideological Micro-Contestations. Cognition and Instruction, 34(4), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2016.1210418.
Phillips, J. J., & Phillips, P. P. (2016). Handbook of Training Evaluation and Measurement Methods. In Handbook of Training Evaluation and Measurement Methods. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080572659.
Putri, R., Johar, R., & Munzir, S. (2022). Teachers’ Perception About Islamic Values Integration Into Mathematics Learning Through Comics. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 10(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v10i1.606
Rennie, L., & Parker, L.. (1996). Placing Physics Problems in Real-Life Context: Students’ Reactions and Performance. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 42(1), 55–59. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/aeipt.71579.
Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori Respons Butir dan Penerapannya: untuk peneliti, praktisi pengukuran dan pengujian, mahasiswa pascasarjana. Nuha Medika.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian. Parama.
Safaruddin, Anisa, & AF, M. S. (2012). Partial Credit Model ( PCM ) dalam Penskoran Politomi pada Teori Respon Butir. Jurnal Matematika, Statistika, & Komputasi, 9(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.20956/jmsk.v9i1.3397
Sari, I. P. M., Jatmiko, B., & Suprapto, N. (2023). Students’ Physics Problem-Solving Skills in Daily Life Context: Between Confession and Fact. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(1), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i1.2561.
Shahbari, J. A., Daher, W., Baya’a, N., & Jaber, O. (2020). Prospective Teachers’ Development of Meta-Cognitive Functions in Solving Mathematical-Based Programming Problems With Scratch. Symmetry, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/SYM12091569.
Shantika, E. G., & Istiyono, E. (2019). A diagnosis of students’ errors in answering the mathematics test in senior high school. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i2.16370.
Supriadi, N., Syazali, M., Lestari, B. D., Dewi, E. S., Utami, L. F., Mardani, L. A., & Putra, F. G. (2019). The Utilization of Project Based Learning and Guided Discovery Learning: Effective Methods to Improve Students’ Mathematics Ability. Al-Ta Lim Journal, 25(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.15548/jt.v25i3.487.
Sustekova, E., Kubiatko, M., & Usak, M. (2019). Validation of critical thinking test on Slovak conditions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/112295.
Syafril, S., Aini, N. R., Netriwati, Pahrudin, A., Yaumas, N. E., & Engkizar. (2020). Spirit of Mathematics Critical Thinking Skills (CTS). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012069.
Ulandari, L., Amry, Z., & Saragih, S. (2019). Development of Learning Materials Based on Realistic Mathematics Education Approach to Improve Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 375–383. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5721.
Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word Problems in Mathematics Education: A Survey. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4.
Walidin, W., Idris, S., & Tabrani ZA. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif & Grounded Theory. FTK Ar-Raniry Press.
Xiao, Y., Han, J., Koenig, K., Xiong, J., & Bao, L. (2018). Multilevel Rasch Modeling of Two-Tier Multiple Choice Test: A Case Study Using Lawson’s Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 20104. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020104.
Yang, T. C., Chen, S. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2015). The Influences of a Two-Tier Test Strategy on Student Learning: A Lag Sequential Analysis Approach. Computers and Education, 82, 366–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.021.
Zahroh, H., Hafidah, Dhofir, & Zayyadi, M. (2020). Gerakan Literasi Matematika dalam Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa. Sustainability (Switzerland), 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.33387/dpi.v9i2.2293.
Zanabazar, A., Deleg, A., Ravdan, M., & Tsogt-erdene, E. (2023). The Relationship between Mathematics Anxiety and Mathematical Performance among Undergraduate Students. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 11(1), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v11i1.780.
Ziaurrahman, Z., Tabrani ZA & Andriansyah, A. (2024). Pengembangan E-Book Interaktif untuk Menunjang Pembelajaran Diferensiasi pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 8(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v8i1.1333.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2025 Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Semua materi yang diterbitkan oleh Jurnal_Didaktika_Pendidikan_Dasar dilisensikan di bawah Lisensi Internasional Creative Commons 4.0 (CC-BY-SA) atau lisensi yang setara sebagai lisensi optimal untuk publikasi, distribusi, penggunaan, dan penggunaan kembali karya ilmiah. Izin akses di luar cakupan lisensi ini mungkin tersedia di perpustakaan digital dan database jurnal akses terbuka.
