Mapping Fifth-Grade Students Conceptual Understanding of Cube Powers and Cube Roots: A Descriptive Study at SD Negeri 2 Kendari

Penulis

  • Muhammad Ilham Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari, Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia , Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari, Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia
  • Imaludin Agus Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari, Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia , Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari, Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia
  • Hasnia Hasnia Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari, Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia , Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari, Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia
  • Asep Saeful Rohman Universitas Padjajaran, Jawa Barat, Indonesia , Universitas Padjajaran, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v9i3.2005

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan pemahaman konseptual siswa kelas V di SD Negeri 2 Kendari terkait pangkat tiga (kubik) dan akar pangkat tiga. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif, penelitian ini mengkaji tiga indikator pemahaman konseptual: klasifikasi objek matematika, pemilihan dan penggunaan prosedur, serta penerapan konsep dalam pemecahan masalah. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes tertulis pemahaman konseptual dan wawancara lanjutan dengan siswa yang mewakili kelompok berkemampuan tinggi, sedang, dan rendah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman konseptual siswa tidak merata pada setiap indikator. Sebagian besar siswa menunjukkan kemampuan yang cukup dalam mengklasifikasikan bilangan kubik dan mengidentifikasi karakteristik struktural pangkat tiga. Namun, muncul kesulitan yang cukup besar dalam memilih prosedur yang tepat dan memahami struktur multiplikatif yang mendasari operasi pangkat tiga serta operasi inversnya. Miskonsepsi, seperti mengartikan pemangkatan tiga sebagai penjumlahan berulang atau menganggap akar pangkat tiga sebagai pembagian sederhana—tampak pada siswa berkemampuan sedang dan terutama rendah. Pemecahan masalah menjadi tantangan paling besar, di mana banyak siswa kesulitan mengintegrasikan informasi, memilih operasi yang relevan, atau menerapkan konsep dalam situasi kontekstual. Secara keseluruhan, penelitian ini memberikan profil terperinci mengenai kekuatan dan tantangan pemahaman konseptual siswa, sekaligus menawarkan wawasan yang dapat digunakan untuk perbaikan pembelajaran. Hasil ini menegaskan perlunya pengalaman belajar yang menekankan hubungan antarkonsep, representasi yang beragam, serta koreksi eksplisit terhadap miskonsepsi untuk mendukung pemahaman matematika yang lebih mendalam.

Referensi

Arieli‐Attali, M., & Cayton-Hodges, G. A. (2014). Expanding TheCBALTM Mathematics Assessments To Elementary Grades: The Development of a Competency Model and a Rational Number Learning Progression. Ets Research Report Series, 2014(1), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12008

Banawi, A., Sulaeman, S., Ridwan, M., Sopandi, W., Kadarohman, A., & Solehuddin, M. (2022). Developing Conceptual Change Text on the States of Matter and Their Changes for Prospective Elementary School Teachers. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 30(4), 1955–1974. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.30.4.25

Bulunuz, N., & Jarrett, O. S. (2010). The Effects of Hands-on Learning Stations on Building American Elementary Teachers’ Understanding About Earth And Space Science Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75230

Copur‐Gencturk, Y. (2021). Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of Fraction Operations: Results From a National Sample of Elementary School Teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(3), 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10033-4

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A., Büttner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). The Effects of Teacher Competence on Student Outcomes in Elementary Science Education: The Mediating Role of Teaching Quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102882

Kotler, R., Rosario, M., Varelas, M., Phillips, N. C., Tsachor, R. P., & Woodard, R. (2024). Latinx Students Embodying Justice‐centered Science: Agency Through Imagining via the Performing Arts. Science Education, 108(3), 851–889. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21859

Lane, J. D., Wellman, H. M., & Evans, E. M. (2014). Approaching an Understanding of Omniscience From the Preschool Years to Early Adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 50(10), 2380–2392. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037715

Levy, A. R., & Mensah, F. M. (2020). Learning Through the Experience of Water in Elementary School Science. Water, 13(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13010043

Macanas, G. A., & Rogayan, D. V. (2019). Enhancing Elementary Pupils’ Conceptual Understanding on Matter Through Sci-Vestigative Pedagogical Strategy (SPS). Participatory Educational Research, 6(2), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.19.22.6.2

Mahmood, A. (2014). Understanding of Elementary School Teachers of 3rd World Country About Levels of SOLO Taxonomy. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n23p1135

Miles, M. B., & Huberman. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A Sourcebook of new methods, California. Sage Publication.

Mohamed, R., Ghazali, M., & Samsudin, M. A. (2021). A Systematic Review on Teaching Fraction for Understanding Through Representation on Web of Science Database Using PRISMA. Lumat International Journal on Math Science and Technology Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.9.1.1449

Mutawah, M. A. Al, Thomas, R., Eid, A., Mahmoud, E. Y., & Fateel, M. J. (2019). Conceptual Understanding, Procedural Knowledge and Problem-Solving Skills in Mathematics: High School Graduates Work Analysis and Standpoints. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.258.273

Prosser, S. K., & Bismarck, S. F. (2023). Concrete–Representational–Abstract (CRA) Instructional Approach in an Algebra I Inclusion Class: Knowledge Retention Versus Students’ Perception. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1061. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101061

Putra, L. V, Sukestiyarno, Masrukan, & Widodo, J. (2024). Integrating Numeration in Mathematics Learning. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(4), 1699–1710. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i4.1546

Sartono, S., Triswandari, R., Nisa, S., Safitri, S., Ariani, Y., Zainil, M., & Helsa, Y. (2024). Analysis of Students’ Learning Loss in Math in Padang City, Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 18(3), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.v18i3.pp431-446

Shahid, S., Kanwal, W., & Parveen, K. (2023). Effectiveness of Science Textbook Activities for Conceptual Understanding of Students. Journal of Management Practices Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.33152/jmphss-7.2.1

Souza, M. A. V. F. de, & Powell, A. B. (2021). How Do Textbooks From Brazil, the United States, and Japan Deal With Fractions? Acta Scientiae, 23(4), 77–111. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6413

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D. Alfabeta.

Walker, T. J., Kohl, H. W., Bartholomew, J. B., Green, C., & Fernández, M. E. (2022). Using Implementation Mapping to Develop and Test an Implementation Strategy for Active Learning to Promote Physical Activity in Children: A Feasibility Study Using a Hybrid Type 2 Design. Implementation Science Communications, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00271-9

Yaman, H. (2023). A Thematic Review of Studies on Specific Learning Disabilities in Science Education. Participatory Educational Research, 10(2), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.32.10.2

Young, A. G., & Shtulman, A. (2020). How Children’s Cognitive Reflection Shapes Their Science Understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01247

Diterbitkan

2025-11-30

Cara Mengutip

Ilham, M., Agus, I., Hasnia, H., & Rohman, A. S. (2025). Mapping Fifth-Grade Students Conceptual Understanding of Cube Powers and Cube Roots: A Descriptive Study at SD Negeri 2 Kendari. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 9(3), 1015-1036. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v9i3.2005