Integrasi Pembelajaran Discovery STEM Learning dan V-Lab pada Materi Pesawat Sederhana untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa dan Keterampilan Kolaborasi

Wahyu Sugiarto; Sabar Nurrohma; Ismail Fikri Natiadiwijaya; Herlina Damayanti

doi:10.26811/didaktika.v10i1.2050

Penulis

Wahyu Sugiarto Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia , Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Sabar Nurrohma Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia , Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Ismail Fikri Natiadiwijaya 3Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia , 3Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Herlina Damayanti Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 11 Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia , Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri 11 Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v10i1.2050

Abstrak

Pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan kolaborasi sangat penting dikembangkan dalam mendukung pendidikan abad 21. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis efektivitas pembelajaran Discovery Learning berpendekatan STEM yang dipadukan dengan virtual laboratory pada materi pesawat sederhana dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan kolaborasi siswa kelas VIII SMP. Penelitian menggunakan desain eksperimen satu kelompok pretest–posttest pada 31 siswa. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes pemahaman konsep dan angket kolaborasi, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif, uji Shapiro–Wilk, uji Paired Sample t-Test, effect size Cohen’s d, dan N-Gain. Hasil menunjukkan peningkatan rata-rata pemahaman konsep dari 55,16 menjadi 64,52 dan kolaborasi dari 37,00 menjadi 39,53. Uji t berpasangan menghasilkan Sig. (2-tailed) 0,001 untuk pemahaman konsep dan 0,000 untuk kolaborasi, menandakan perbedaan yang signifikan. Nilai effect size sebesar 0,80 (konsep) dan 1,07 (kolaborasi) berada pada kategori besar, sedangkan N-Gain masing-masing 0,21 dan 0,17 termasuk kategori rendah. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa Discovery Learning berpendekatan STEM efektif meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan kolaborasi, meskipun peningkatan relatif terhadap skor maksimum masih perlu dioptimalkan.

Biografi Penulis

Wahyu Sugiarto, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

SMP Satu Atap n 7 Biak Timur,
science teacher

Referensi

Afnan, M. Z., Utomo, B., & Purana, I. P. T. (2025). Making Kokedama as an Implementation of Ecological Awareness at NSA Surabaya High School. Biodidaktika: Jurnal Biologi dan Pembelajarannya, 20(2), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.62870/biodidaktika.v20i2.32532

Akmam, A., Ahzari, S., Emiliannur, E., & Anshari, R. (2025). Enhancing Science Literacy through Cognitive Conflict-Based Generative Learning Model: An Experimental Study in Physics Learning. Social Science and Humanities Journal, 9(0), 8507–8522. https://doi.org/10.18535/sshj.v9i07.1934

Amin, M., Rahmawati, Y., & Sudrajat, A. (2022). Enhancing Primary School Students’ Critical Thinking Skills through the Integration of Inquiry-Based STEM Approach on Teaching Electricity in Science Learning. Journal of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2377/1/012090

Dulyapit, A., Yunus, M., Kusuma, F. H., & Khotimah, S. H. (2025). Penerapan Model Discovery Inquiry Berbasis Deep Learning untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas VI MI Fatahillah Kota Depok. DIKODA Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.37366/jpgsd.v6i1.6234

Baiti, E. N., Nurmadina, N., Novitasari, D., & Nurjanah, N. (2025). Discovery Learning: Meningkatkan Keterampilan Kolaborasi dan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 9(3), 955–976. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v9i3.1885

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.PPJ.39.8

Bruner, J. S. (1961). The Act of Discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.

Bybee, R. W. (2015). The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities. In The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities. NSTA Press. https://doi.org/10.2505/9781936959259

Callaghan, N. I., Cadavid, J. L., & Chang, H. (2020). Discovery: Differential Student Impact is Evident within an Inquiry-Focused Secondary/Post-Secondary Collaborative STEM Program. In 2020 ASEE Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/discovery-differential-student-impact-is-evident-within-an-inquiry-focused-secondary-post-secondary-collaborative-stem-program

Chiu, T. K. F., Li, Y., Ding, M., Hallström, J., & Koretsky, M. D. (2025). A Decade of Research Contributions and Emerging Trends in the International Journal of STEM Education. International Journal of STEM Education, 12(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-025-00533-7

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ellianawati, E., Subali, B., Putra, B. R., Wahyuni, S., Dwijananti, P., Adhi, M. A., & Yusof, M. M. M. (2025). Critical Thinking and Creativity in STEAM-based Collaborative Learning on Renewable Energy Issues. Journal of Education and Learning, 19(1), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21638

Febriyana, R., Setiani, N., & Isnarto, I. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep IPA Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 6(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3421

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2022). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (Eleventh Edition). McGraw-Hill Higher Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED323168

Grangeat, M., Harrison, C., & Dolin, J. (2024). Introduction: Exploring Assessment in STEM Inquiry Learning Classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003466079-1

Gredler, M. E. (2009). Hiding in Plain Sight: The Stages of Mastery/Self-Regulation in Vygotsky’s Cultural-Historical Theory. Educational Psychologist, 44, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802616259

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-Engagement vs. Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 64, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hastuti, P. W., Tyas, R. A., Roektiningroem, E., & Pramitasari, N. (2025). i-STEAM Model: How can Inquiry-Based Learning and STEAM be Integrated to Improve Students’ Science Process Skills?. In The 8th International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2024) (pp. 1156-1165). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-360-3_99

Herlina, E., Hindriana, A. F., & Ismail, A. Y. (2025). Pengembangan E-Modul Interaktif IPA pada Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi untuk Meningkatkan Berpikir Kreatif dan Mengembangkan Kreativitas Siswa. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 9(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v9i1.1713

Janah, F. R., & Hidayati, S. N. (2025). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep IPA Siswa SMP di Surabaya. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 15(1), 204-209. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v15i1.2416

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Kotsis, K. T. (2024). Significance of Experiments in Inquiry-based Science Teaching. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(2), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.2.815

Lestari, A. K., & Fitriani, A. (2023). Application of STEM-Integrated Guided Inquiry Model to Improve Science Process Skills of Junior High School Learners on Human Respiratory System Material. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 11078-11084. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5845

Liu, B., Ying Xu, Y., & Wan, Z. (2024). Systematic Review of Collaborative Learning Influencing Students’ Social and Cognitive Development. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on New Media Development and Modern Education (NMDME-24), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-600-0_37

Lubis, I., & Jayanti, U. N. A. D. (2025). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek terhadap Kemampuan Kolaborasi dan Literasi Lingkungan Siswa SMP pada Materi Ekosistem. BIOEDUSAINS: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Dan Sains, 8(5), 777–797. https://doi.org/10.31539/z0tf9e98

Mubarok, M., Yulandra, R., & Iskandar, B. A. (2025). The Effect of Collaborative Learning Model on Improving Science Concept Understanding among Prospective Elementary School Teachers at Lambung Mangkurat University Student. EDUKASIA Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 1121-1132. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v6i2.1716

Ningkaula, T. A., Laliyo, L. A. R., Iyabu, H., & Abdullah, R. (2021). Dampak Model Discovery Learning Berpendekatan STEM terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Hidrolisis Garam Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 5(2 ), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v5i1.28871

Nursa’ban, E., Ewisahrani, E., & Fathurrahmaniah, F. (2025). Upaya Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep IPA Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 4(8), 941-955. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v4i8.4348

Pacaci, C., Ustun, U., & Ozdemir, O. F. (2024). Effectiveness of Conceptual Change Strategies in Science Education: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(6), 1263–1325. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21887

Piaget, J. (1976). The psychology of intelligence. Littlefield, Adams & Co.

Rilianty, A. P., Handayani, M., & Nugroho, W. (2024). Pendekatan Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, & Math (STEAM) untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Abad 21 Siswa Sekolah Dasar. PRIMER: Journal of Primary Education Research, 2(1), 78-85. https://doi.org/10.57176/primer.v1i2.13

Safarini, M., Fitriani, S., Suwandi, T., & Rahmat, A. (2026). Student Engagement and Conceptual Change through Gamified Flipped Classrooms in Biology Education. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 19(1), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.62844

Sari, D. I. P., Sitompul, S. S., & Hamdani, H. (2018). Remediasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Model Direct Instruction Berbantuan Animasi Flash pada Materi Tuas. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK), 7(8). https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v7i8.27155

Stylianidou, F., Glauert, E. B., Rossis, D., Compton, A., Cremin, T., Craft, A., & Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2018). Fostering Inquiry and Creativity in Early Years STEM Education: Policy Recommendations from the Creative Little Scientists Project. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 15. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/3875

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (13th ed.). ALFABETA.

Sumarno, W. K., Shodikin, A., Rahmawati, A. A., Shafira, P. D., & Solikha, I. (2021). Gerakan Literasi Sains melalui Pengenalan STEAM pada Anak di Komunitas “Panggon Moco” Gresik. JPM (Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat), 6(2), 702–709. https://doi.org/10.21067/jpm.v6i2.5835

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7

Vuorenmaa, E., Nguyen, A., & Järvelä, S. (2025). How do Social Interaction and Group-Level Regulation Shape Task Perceptions in Collaborative Learning Task?. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 69(6), 1190-1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2024.2394409

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Z, M., Rokhmat, M., Muliadi, J., Azizi, A., Ardiansyah, A., Hamidi, B., Pauzi, H., Yamin, I., Rasyidi, M., Rahmatiah, M., Sudirman, R., & Khery, S. (2022). Pemahaman Nature of Science (Hakekat IPA) Bagi Guru IPA: Solusi Membelajarkan IPA Multidimensi. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(21), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7272704